🧠 logic
Step-by-step solutions with LaTeX - clean, fast, and student-friendly.
Logical Fallacies
1. **Problem (a):** Check if the proposition $$1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \cdots + n^3 = \left[\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\right]^2$$ is true for all positive integers $n$ based on the given argument.
Logical Equivalence Quantifiers Inference
1. **Show that $P : p \to (q \to r)$ and $Q : (p \wedge q) \to r$ are logically equivalent.**
(a) Using a truth table:
Xor Equivalence
1. **Problem statement:**
Show the equivalences involving the XOR operator $p \oplus q$.
Correct Options
1. The problem states that there are multiple options and exactly 2 of them are correct.
2. To analyze this, we need to consider the total number of options and identify which 2 ar
Truth Evaluation
1. The user asks if a given statement is true or false.
2. However, no specific statement or problem is provided to evaluate.
At Least One Wrong
1. The phrase "at least one is wrong" typically refers to a situation where among multiple statements or conditions, one or more are incorrect.
2. To analyze this mathematically, c
Inference Rules
1. **Problem:** Given the propositions:
- If I am the King, then you are the Queen.
Tautology Check
1. **State the problem:** We need to determine if the expression $$(((P \oplus Q) \wedge (Q \lor R)) \to (P \lor R)) \leftrightarrow ((P \to R) \lor (Q \leftrightarrow R))$$ is a t
Distributive Law
Problem: Verify that $ (p \vee q) \wedge (p \vee r) $ is logically equivalent to $ p \vee (q \wedge r) $.
1. Approach: We prove the equivalence by showing each direction separately
Logic Validity
1. Problem: Determine the validity of each argument.
(a) Given: $p \to q$, $q$. Conclusion: $p$.
Logical Conjunction
1. The problem is about understanding the logical conjunction (AND) operation between two propositions $p$ and $q$.
2. The conjunction $p \wedge q$ is true only when both $p$ and $
Logical Implications
1. **Stating the problem:** We are given propositions and their logical implications, converses, contrapositives, and inverses. We need to understand these concepts and apply them
Logic Translation
1. The problem involves translating English statements about stocks, interest rates, and John's attributes into logical expressions using propositional logic.
2. For the first set:
Predicate Quantifiers
1. **Problem statement:** Express the given statements using predicates and quantifiers.
2. **Define predicates:**
Logic Translation
1. The problem asks to translate logical statements into English, where $R(x)$ means "$x$ is a rabbit" and $H(x)$ means "$x$ hops", with the domain being all animals.
2. For statem
Logical Implication
1. **State the problem:** Simplify and analyze the logical expression $$((p \Rightarrow q) \wedge (\neg q)) \Rightarrow \neg q$$.
2. **Recall definitions:**
Quantified Statements
1. **Problem 1:** Given the predicate $P(x,y): xy = 1$ with $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$, evaluate the truth value of the statement $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, \exists y \in \mathbb{R}$ suc
Predicate Truth
1. We are given the universe $U$ as the set of integers, and predicates:
- $P(x)$: $x$ is a prime number
Logical Implication
1. **State the problem:** We want to show that the statement $\sim r \to s$ logically follows from the premises $p \to r$, $\sim p \to q$, and $q \to s$.
2. **Analyze the premises:
Logical Equivalence
1. **State the problem:** Show that $ (p \to q) \wedge (p \to r) $ and $ p \to (q \wedge r) $ are logically equivalent.
2. **Recall the implication equivalence:**
Conditional Forms
1. **State the problem:** We are given the conditional statement: "The dog barks if it sees a stranger." We need to express its contrapositive, converse, and inverse.
2. **Identify