1. The problem is to determine why chronological order is a bad fit for a paper on the importance of voting. 2. The options given are: - Lisa needs a structure that will allow her to write a shorter paper. - Lisa needs to focus on the benefits of voting, rather than telling its history. - Lisa needs a structure that will allow her to describe the steps in the election process. - All of the above. 3. Chronological order arranges information according to time sequence, which is useful for historical narratives or processes. 4. However, if Lisa's goal is to emphasize the benefits of voting rather than its history, chronological order is not ideal because it focuses on when events happened, not on thematic benefits. 5. Also, if Lisa wants to write a shorter paper, chronological order might force her to include unnecessary historical details. 6. Describing steps in the election process is a case where chronological order might be appropriate, but since the focus is on benefits, this is less relevant. 7. Therefore, the best answer is "All of the above" because all reasons explain why chronological order is a bad fit. Final answer: All of the above.