Implication Tautologies
1. **Problem statement:**
We need to determine for each pair of expressions A and B whether the implication $A \to B$ is a tautology and whether $B \to A$ is a tautology.
2. **Recall:**
- An implication $A \to B$ is a tautology if it is true under every interpretation.
- For quantified statements, tautology means the implication holds for all possible domains and predicates.
---
### (a)
Expressions:
- $A: (\forall x, P(x)) \to (\exists x, Q(x))$
- $B: (\exists x, P(x)) \to Q(x)$
**Step 1:** Analyze $A \to B$.
- $A$ says: If $P(x)$ is true for all $x$, then there exists some $x$ such that $Q(x)$ is true.
- $B$ says: If there exists some $x$ such that $P(x)$ is true, then $Q(x)$ is true (note $Q(x)$ without quantifier means $Q$ holds for that particular $x$).
**Step 2:** Check if $A \to B$ is always true.
- Consider a domain with one element $a$.
- Suppose $P(a)$ is true for all $x$ (only $a$), so $\forall x, P(x)$ is true.
- Then $A$'s antecedent is true, so $A$ is true if $\exists x, Q(x)$ is true.
- But $B$ requires that if $\exists x, P(x)$ then $Q(x)$ holds for that $x$.
- Since $B$'s conclusion is $Q(x)$ for the same $x$ that satisfies $P(x)$, $B$ is not necessarily true if $Q(x)$ is false for that $x$.
- So $A \to B$ is **not** a tautology.
**Step 3:** Check if $B \to A$ is always true.
- $B$ says: If there exists $x$ with $P(x)$, then $Q(x)$ holds for that $x$.
- $A$ says: If $P(x)$ holds for all $x$, then there exists $x$ with $Q(x)$.
- If $B$ is true, then for some $x$ with $P(x)$, $Q(x)$ holds.
- If $P(x)$ holds for all $x$, then certainly $\exists x, P(x)$, so $Q(x)$ holds for that $x$.
- Hence $\exists x, Q(x)$ is true.
- So $B \to A$ is a tautology.
---
### (b)
Expressions:
- $A: \exists x \forall y, P(x,y)$
- $B: \forall y \exists x, P(x,y)$
**Step 1:** Analyze $A \to B$.
- $A$ says: There exists an $x$ such that for all $y$, $P(x,y)$ holds.
- $B$ says: For every $y$, there exists an $x$ such that $P(x,y)$ holds.
- If $A$ is true, then for that particular $x$, $P(x,y)$ holds for all $y$.
- So for each $y$, there exists an $x$ (the same $x$) such that $P(x,y)$ holds.
- Therefore, $A \to B$ is a tautology.
**Step 2:** Analyze $B \to A$.
- $B$ says: For every $y$, there exists an $x$ such that $P(x,y)$ holds.
- $A$ says: There exists an $x$ such that for all $y$, $P(x,y)$ holds.
- $B$ does not guarantee the same $x$ works for all $y$.
- So $B \to A$ is **not** a tautology.
---
**Final answers:**
- (a) $A \to B$ is not a tautology; $B \to A$ is a tautology.
- (b) $A \to B$ is a tautology; $B \to A$ is not a tautology.