Segregation Duties 9720A6
1. **Stating the problem:** The problem involves understanding how segregation of duties and independent supervision serve as foundational solutions in internal control systems to minimize collusion risks, despite limitations like human error.
2. **Key concepts and formula:** Segregation of duties means dividing authorization, recording, and custody functions among different individuals to prevent fraud. Rotating these duties periodically (every 6-12 months) reduces long-term collusion risk.
3. **Explanation of solutions:**
- Rotasi tugas (duty rotation) disrupts collusion patterns by changing who performs critical tasks regularly.
- Whistleblower systems provide anonymous reporting channels, encouraging early detection of hidden collusion.
- Automated data analytics audits use AI to detect anomalous transaction patterns beyond manual collusion detection.
4. **Addressing limitations:** While these layered controls reduce collusion risk, human errors and management oversight lapses remain possible. Training and a strong ethical culture help mitigate these.
5. **Summary table interpretation:**
| Solution | Anti-Collusion Mechanism | Addresses Limitation |
|-------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Rotasi Tugas | Disrupts long-term collusion | Human error |
| Whistleblower | Early detection via anonymous tips| Hidden collusion |
| Audit Otomatis | AI-driven pattern analysis | Management neglect |
**Final answer:** Segregation of duties combined with independent supervision, duty rotation, whistleblower systems, and automated audits form a multi-layered internal control framework that effectively minimizes collusion risks while acknowledging human and managerial limitations.