Solve Main Formula
**Problem:**
Given the equation:
$$\beta S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i + \beta S_0 \eta_1 p \delta h \sigma \phi_e \phi_i \phi_h + \beta S_0 \eta_2 \kappa \delta t \sigma \phi_e \phi_i \phi_t + \beta S_0 \eta_3 \sigma(p \delta h m h d \phi t + \kappa \delta t m t d \phi h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_e \phi_i \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c$$
where
$$\kappa=1-p$$
$$\phi_e = \sigma + \mu$$
$$\phi_i = \alpha + p \delta_h + \kappa \delta_t + \mu + \mu_i$$
$$\phi_h = \gamma + \mu_h + \mu + m h d$$
$$\phi_t = m t d + \mu + \mu_t + \psi$$
$$\phi_c = \xi + \mu_c + \mu$$
Make $\beta$, $\sigma$, $\eta_1$, and $\mu$ the subject of the formula.
---
**Step 1: State the expression clearly and define variables**
Let
$$A = \beta S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i$$
$$B = \beta S_0 \eta_1 p \delta_h \sigma \phi_e \phi_i \phi_h$$
$$C = \beta S_0 \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \sigma \phi_e \phi_i \phi_t$$
$$D = \beta S_0 \eta_3 \sigma (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_e \phi_i \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c$$
So the equation can be written as
$$A + B + C + D$$
Our goal is to isolate $\beta$, $\sigma$, $\eta_1$, and $\mu$.
---
**Step 2: Isolate $\beta$**
Note that each term contains a factor $\beta S_0$. Factorize this:
$$\beta S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i [1 + \eta_1 p \delta_h \phi_h + \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t + \eta_3 (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c]$$
Let the bracket be $K$:
$$K = 1 + \eta_1 p \delta_h \phi_h + \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t + \eta_3 (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c$$
So the whole original expression is:
$$\beta S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i K$$
Then for a given value on the right hand side (say $R$), we have:
$$R = \beta S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i K$$
Hence:
$$\beta = \frac{R}{S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i K}$$
---
**Step 3: Make $\sigma$ the subject**
Substitute $\phi_e = \sigma + \mu$
Write $\beta S_0 \sigma \phi_i K (\sigma + \mu) = R$
Rearranging:
$$R = \beta S_0 \phi_i K \sigma (\sigma + \mu)$$
Rewrite as:
$$\beta S_0 \phi_i K (\sigma^2 + \mu \sigma) = R$$
Which gives quadratic in $\sigma$:
$$\sigma^2 + \mu \sigma - \frac{R}{\beta S_0 \phi_i K} = 0$$
Solve for $\sigma$ using quadratic formula:
$$\sigma = \frac{-\mu \pm \sqrt{\mu^2 + 4 \frac{R}{\beta S_0 \phi_i K}}}{2}$$
---
**Step 4: Make $\eta_1$ the subject**
Recall from $K$:
$$K = 1 + \eta_1 p \delta_h \phi_h + \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t + \eta_3 (...)$$
Isolate $\eta_1$:
$$K - 1 - \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t - \eta_3 (...) = \eta_1 p \delta_h \phi_h$$
So:
$$\eta_1 = \frac{K - 1 - \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t - \eta_3 (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c}{p \delta_h \phi_h}$$
---
**Step 5: Make $\mu$ the subject**
Recall $\phi_e = \sigma + \mu$
Also, $\phi_i = \alpha + p \delta_h + \kappa \delta_t + \mu + \mu_i$
$\phi_h$, $\phi_t$, $\phi_c$ also depend on $\mu$ but only $\phi_h = \gamma + \mu_h + \mu + m h d$, $\phi_t = mtd + \mu + \mu_t + \psi$, and $\phi_c = \xi + \mu_c + \mu$ depend on $\mu$
If we want to solve $\mu$ explicitly, the equation becomes nonlinear and more complex requiring implicit or numerical methods.
Rewrite the expression for $R$ in terms of $\mu$ explicitly as:
$$R = \beta S_0 \sigma (\sigma + \mu) (\alpha + p \delta_h + (1-p) \delta_t + \mu + \mu_i) K$$
where $K$ also depends on $\mu$ via $\phi_h, \phi_t, \phi_c$.
The explicit formula for $\mu$ involves solving a nonlinear equation; further data or numerical approach is needed.
---
**Final answer summary:**
$$\beta = \frac{R}{S_0 \sigma \phi_e \phi_i K}$$
$$\sigma = \frac{-\mu \pm \sqrt{\mu^2 + 4 \frac{R}{\beta S_0 \phi_i K}}}{2}$$
$$\eta_1 = \frac{K - 1 - \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t - \eta_3 (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c}{p \delta_h \phi_h}$$
$$\text{where } K = 1 + \eta_1 p \delta_h \phi_h + \eta_2 \kappa \delta_t \phi_t + \eta_3 (p \delta_h m h d \phi_t + \kappa \delta_t m t d \phi_h + \eta \phi_h \phi_t) \phi_h \phi_t \phi_c$$
$\mu$ requires solving an implicit nonlinear equation due to its presence in multiple $\phi$ terms.